🔗 Share this article

Labuschagne methodically applies butter on the top and bottom of a slice of soft bread. “That’s essential,” he states as he brings down the lid of his grilled cheese press. “Perfect. Then you get it crisp on each side.” He opens the grill to reveal a golden square of pure toasted goodness, the bubbling cheese happily bubbling away. “Here’s the trick of the trade,” he announces. At which point, he does something shocking and odd.

Already, it’s clear a sense of disinterest is beginning to form across your eyes. The warning signs of sportswriting pretension are blinking intensely. You’re likely conscious that Labuschagne made 160 runs for his state team this week and is being eagerly promoted for an national team comeback before the England-Australia contest.

No doubt you’d prefer to read more about his performance. But first – you now realise with an anguished sigh – you’re going to have to get through a section of playful digression about toasted sandwiches, plus an extra unwanted bonus paragraph of overly analytical commentary in the second person. You groan once more.

Marnus transfers the sandwich on to a dish and moves toward the fridge. “Few try this,” he remarks, “but I personally prefer the toastie cold. Done, in the fridge. You allow the cheese to set, go bat, come back. Perfect. It’s ideal.”

The Cricket Context

Okay, let’s try it like this. How about we cover the cricket bit out of the way first? Little treat for making it this far. And while there may still be six weeks until the first Test, Labuschagne’s century against Tasmania – his third this season in all formats – feels importantly timed.

We have an Australia top three badly short of consistency and technique, revealed against the South African team in the Test championship decider, exposed again in the Caribbean afterwards. Labuschagne was omitted during that tour, but on a certain level you sensed Australia were keen to restore him at the first opportunity. Now he appears to have given them the right opportunity.

And this is a plan that Australia need to work. Khawaja has a single hundred in his last 44 knocks. Konstas looks not quite a first-innings batsman and more like the handsome actor who might play a Test opener in a Indian film. No other options has presented a strong argument. Nathan McSweeney looks cooked. Another option is still surprisingly included, like moths or damp. Meanwhile their captain, Pat Cummins, is hurt and suddenly this seems like a surprisingly weak team, short of strength or equilibrium, the kind of natural confidence that has often put Australia 2-0 up before a ball is bowled.

The Batsman’s Revival

Here comes Labuschagne: a leading Test player as just two years ago, recently omitted from the ODI side, the right person to return structure to a fragile lineup. And we are advised this is a composed and reflective Labuschagne these days: a streamlined, fundamental-focused Labuschagne, no longer as extremely focused with technical minutiae. “It seems I’ve really cut out extras,” he said after his ton. “Not overthinking, just what I must bat effectively.”

Naturally, this is doubted. Probably this is a new approach that exists only in Labuschagne’s personal view: still constantly refining that method from morning to night, going further toward simplicity than anyone else would try. You want less technical? Marnus will devote weeks in the practice sessions with advisors and replays, exhaustively remoulding himself into the most basic batsman that has ever been seen. That’s the trait of the obsessed, and the characteristic that has consistently made Labuschagne one of the highly engaging sportsmen in the cricket.

Bigger Scene

It could be before this very open England-Australia contest, there is even a type of appealing difference to Labuschagne’s unquenchable obsession. For England we have a team for whom any kind of analysis, especially personal critique, is a kind of dangerous taboo. Trust your gut. Be where the ball is. Embrace the current.

On the opposite side you have a individual like Labuschagne, a man terminally obsessed with the game and totally indifferent by public perception, who sees cricket even in the spaces between the cricket, who handles this unusual pursuit with exactly the level of quirky respect it demands.

His method paid off. During his focused era – from the moment he strode out to come in for a hurt Smith at the famous ground in 2019 to until late 2022 – Labuschagne was able to see the game more deeply. To tap into it – through absolute focus – on a higher, weirder, more frenzied level. During his time with English county cricket, fellow players saw him on the day of a match sitting on a park bench in a meditative condition, actually imagining each delivery of his batting stint. Per the analytics firm, during the initial period of his career a surprisingly high number of chances were dropped off his bat. Somehow Labuschagne had intuited what would happen before others could react to influence it.

Current Struggles

Maybe this was why his performance dipped the time he achieved top ranking. There were no further goals to picture, just a boundless, uncharted void before his eyes. Additionally – he lost faith in his cover drive, got stuck in his crease and seemed to misjudge his positioning. But it’s all the same thing. Meanwhile his mentor, Neil D’Costa, thinks a emphasis on limited-overs started to undermine belief in his alignment. Encouragingly: he’s recently omitted from the ODI side.

Surely it matters, too, that Labuschagne is a man of deep religious faith, an religious believer who holds that this is all basically written out in advance, who thus sees his role as one of reaching this optimal zone, however enigmatic and inexplicable it may appear to the mortal of us.

This approach, to my mind, has long been the key distinction between him and Smith, a more naturally gifted player