🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."